Pksmb-test-plots
From South Dublin Astronomical Society
Contents |
[edit]
PKSMB
psrevolve 195 -0.1 -0.5 12.5 0.8 4.5 0.07 100 1.66 0 -1.8 0.4 0 100 -1 0 0.333 0 0.02 0.5 > output/output.may18-2.26
This represents the best fit that I've been able to generate for the pksmb pulsars with logB > 10 actual results
All pulsars
Datafile output.may18-2.26 ; survey pksmb-n Num : Simulation=862 Survey=859 P : mean=1.6054 survey=0.7730 stdev=3.1669 surveysd=0.7495 B(log): mean=12.6915 survey=12.4570 stdev=13.4056 surveysd=12.7800 DM : mean=351.6310 survey=351.7419 stdev=211.3567 surveysd=222.6000
Pulsars with P<10s
Datafile output.may18-2.26 ; survey pksmb-n Num : Simulation=847 Survey=859 P : mean=1.2823 survey=0.7730 stdev=1.4675 surveysd=0.7495 B(log): mean=12.6378 survey=12.4570 stdev=13.3948 surveysd=12.7800 DM : mean=356.0789 survey=351.7419 stdev=210.1251 surveysd=222.6000
[edit]
DM
The main issue with this is there is a peak at 550-600.
[edit]
P
There are some long period pulsars generated. They are all shown above.
This graph shows just the P < 10s pulsars. The peak isnt as high as the real data and the distribution looks wider.
[edit]
LogB
Should be loaded more into the 12.
[edit]
notes
Trying to correct the issues with these graphs has limited success. I can make the P of LogB fit more closley but the DM histogram gets further from the survey data.
[edit]
PKS70
psrevolve 194 -0.1 -0.5 12.5 0.8 4.5 0.07 100 1.66 0 1.1 0.4 0 100 -1 0 0.333 0 0.02 0.5
spectral index changed to 1.1 to get the number of pulsars correct for the pks70 survey correct.
/home/ssi/awhite/psrevolve/output/output.may20.17
[edit]
P
[edit]
DM
[edit]







